Skip to content

Conversation

@posborne
Copy link
Collaborator

@posborne posborne commented Apr 9, 2025

Stumbled into this while exploring the cli options, was outputting that my machine had multiple TiB of RAM. The version bump isn't necessary but I noticed it was there while looking at the docs.

@posborne posborne force-pushed the fix-machine-fingerprint-bytesize branch from cc287be to c555136 Compare April 10, 2025 16:30
@fitzgen fitzgen requested a review from abrown April 10, 2025 16:33
@abrown
Copy link
Member

abrown commented Apr 15, 2025

My guess is we should rebase this on #284 once that merges?

Stumbled into this while exploring the cli options, was
outputting that my machine had multiple TiB of RAM.  The
version bump isn't necessary but I noticed it was there
while looking at the docs.
@posborne posborne force-pushed the fix-machine-fingerprint-bytesize branch from c555136 to 4fce81d Compare April 17, 2025 20:27
@posborne
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Rebased

@abrown abrown merged commit 40e0232 into bytecodealliance:main Apr 18, 2025
17 checks passed
posborne added a commit to posborne/sightglass that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2025
Stumbled into this while exploring the cli options, was
outputting that my machine had multiple TiB of RAM.  The
version bump isn't necessary but I noticed it was there
while looking at the docs.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants